Browser App Response Time

// Expert user has replied.
C Christopher Sather 3 years 7 months ago
5 5 0

My customer is migrating from telnet to web based apps. We are currently around about 1 second response time(versus 300msec in telnet), and they would like it faster.   They want us to create a tool to figure out why rendering takes so long. We have run the resource monitor tool and do not see any spike in CPU or memory use. Has anyone ever optimized a web app to be sub second, or been able to measure rendering time of images, java script load, execute, or any other browser component that may be slow. It has been recommended they go to AJAX technology for this Application, but are reluctant to to change.  It has also been suggested to change the Java Script to ActiveX. Has anyone tried these browsers at all *       Bluelark Bluelark bought by Handspring Inc. *       Deepfish Beta from Microsoft *       Doris by Anygraaf Oy (Vantaa, Finland) *       iPanel for Palm OS, *       jB5 Mobile Browser Beta from Jataayu Software. *       JOCA by InteracT!V, another proxy-rendering free software. *       Minimo by Mozilla Foundation (based on Gecko). *       Opera Mini by Opera Software - supports most features of stand-alone Opera, but can run on less capable phones by offloading memory-intensive rendering to proxy server (based on Opera Mobile running on a server). *       Opera Mobile by Opera Software - supports all modern web standards supported by desktop browsers, including XHTML, CSS2 and Ajax. Has advanced Small Screen Rendering that adapts regular pages to small screen (proprietary). *       Pixo by Sun Microsystems (Pixo acquired by Sun July 2003) *       PocketWeb by tlogic.de (Heidelberg, Germany) Official product page *       RocketBrowser Rocket Mobile, Inc. (Silicon Valley, CA). *       SAS *       Stanford Power Browser created in Stanford's InfoLab [5] *       TeaShark - a free Java-based browser with a desktop-like layout [6] Things the customer has done so far:

Add logging for page rendering ,server processing time etc

Change Response Redirects to Server.Transfer wherever applicable

Rewrite Majority of Interop calls

Consolidate Stored Procs and consolidate calls to SPs and create views as far as possible since inline sql does not get cached

Move all calls which need to be asynchronous into a service  

Add set timeout code to Master page in OnLoad

Create Qfill Master Page and only include icons critical for navigation

Compress all images

Create an application specific css file and compress it  

Move javascript processing to server side as much as possible to an include file

Ajax simulation

Combine pages that are similar

Possible simplification of screens by removing nice to have controls (impacts functionality)

Please Register or Login to post a reply

5 Replies

C Christopher Sather

Thanks Richard, but now the dumb question from the non programmer.  Where do I put this script, or how do I execute it, and where do the results show up?

C Christopher Sather

Are there any tools or utilities to measure how much time data takes to get through the TCP/IP Stack?Mycustomer wants to know the time it takes in millieseconds from when aweb page is submitted to when it leaves the radio driver. And can wetrack when a HTTP request comes into the radio and how much time tillit is delivered to the application.

R Richard Linsley-Hood

It is quite difficult to get this detailed information and probably uneccessary and not helpful in the first place. The time taken to get the html request out over the network from the termial, the server creating the reply and then transfering that reply back over the network to the terminal takes the majority of the time. That and the rending on the resulting reply to the screen (leaving aside any JavaScript execution) anyway. The time taken for ther packet to make its way up through the TCP/IP stack on the terminal is minor and incdental to all that.Benchmarking the html request times on any terminal can be done quite simply by using code similar to below
WebRequest request = HttpWebRequest.Create(uriString);request.Method = "GET"; HttpWebResponse response = request.GetResponse();Stream s = (Stream)response.GetResponseStream();StreamReader readStream = new StreamReader(s);string dataString = readStream.ReadToEnd();response.Close();s.Close();readStream.Close();The time taken to complete all the above would constitute the minimum time required for a simple web page transfer and will be be very dependant on network and server loads.Richard LH

R Richard Linsley-Hood

27      Pass  Elapsed 0.050072 secs     http://www.demon.net/images/common/demon_logo.gif 26      Pass  Elapsed 0.2804032 secs    http://www.demon.net/ 25      Pass  Elapsed 0.1902736 secs    http://www.google.co.uk/intl/en_uk/images/logo.gif 24      Pass  Elapsed 0.350504 secs     http://www.guardian.co.uk/ 23      Pass  Elapsed 0.3705328 secs    http://uk.reuters.com/ 22      Pass  Elapsed 0.4606624 secs    http://www.google.com 21      Pass  Elapsed 0.50072 secs      http://www.independent.co.uk/ 20      Pass  Elapsed 0.550792 secs     http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ 19      Pass  Elapsed 0.5107344 secs    http://www.reghardware.co.uk/ 18      Pass  Elapsed 0.50072 secs      http://www.theinquirer.net/ 17      Pass  Elapsed 0.4606624 secs    http://www.theregister.co.uk/ 16      Pass  Elapsed 0.4806912 secs    http://www.theregister.co.uk/ 15      Pass  Elapsed 0.550792 secs     http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/ 14      Pass  Elapsed 0.9313392 secs    http://www.cuil.com/ 13      Pass  Elapsed 0.8712528 secs    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/ 12      Pass  Elapsed 0.50072 secs      http://uk.gizmodo.com/ 11      Pass  Elapsed 0.4907056 secs    http://news.bbc.co.uk/ 10      Pass  Elapsed 0.8912816 secs    http://www.wired.com/ 9       Pass  Elapsed 0.75108 secs      http://www.snelflight.co.uk/ 8       Pass  Elapsed 1.1816992 secs    http://alltop.com/ 7       Pass  Elapsed 0.8412096 secs    http://www.motorola.com/ 6       Pass  Elapsed 0.901296 secs     http://www.bsquare.com/ 5       Pass  Elapsed 0.801152 secs     http://www.swiftech.com/ 4       Pass  Elapsed 1.6123184 secs    http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/ 3       Pass  Elapsed 1.2618144 secs    https://web.mail.demon.net/ 2       Pass  Elapsed 1.3319152 secs    http://www.pluralsight.com/ 1       Pass  Elapsed 2.203168 secs     http://www.techfresh.net/ 0       Pass  Elapsed 2.6438016 secs    http://www.dangerden.com/ Further to my previous reply these are the sort of timings that are possible using a simple test app. These timings include the internet overhead (as these are public urls). Richard LH

M Mark Mann

Hi Chris, I believe part of the problem with WEB Applications is that they repaint the entire screen weather it changes or not.  I have two customers that use a webapplication using Symbol Pocket Browser and it's nowhere aggressive as you see with telnet applciations.  So what I ususally say to the customer is eliminate any graphics pictues and make it as simple as possible.  Not sure if there are any third party application that optimize a web applciation for a handheld but anyone who has information on this should respond to this thread.  For the most part customers that demand a subsecond response usually end up with a custom application built for mobilty.  Any one else have any thoughts on this? Mark

CONTACT
Can’t find what you’re looking for?